Home
Research profile
Teaching profile
Professional profile
Personal profile
Contact information

Professor Hossein Saiedian: EECS 690: Data Science

Course title

EECS 690 (3 credit hours) Special topics: Data Science -- Spring 2025
Meets in person Tuesdays and Thursdays, 11:00 am - 12:15 pm, LEEP2 G415
Teaching website: people.eecs.ku.edu/~saiedian/Teaching

Instructor

Professor Hossein Saiedian
Office: Eaton Hall 3012
Telephone: 785-864-8812
E-Mail: saiedian AT ku.edu
WWW: people.eecs.ku.edu/~saiedian
Office hours: Tuesdays and Thursdays, 2:15-3:15 PM (and by appointment)

Course description

This course delivers a thorough, hands-on exploration of the core concepts in data science, utilizing essential programming languages such as Python, R, SQL, and Unix shell. Students navigate the entire data science lifecycle—from data collection and cleaning to analysis, visualization, and data-driven decision-making. They master key techniques including data mining, statistical analysis, and predictive modeling (including classification, regression, and clustering). Real-world case studies in science, engineering, and business present opportunities to tackle diverse challenges by formulating questions, gathering and analyzing data, and developing deployable models. Students also explore critical topics such as ethics, privacy, security, and big data architecture. Prerequisites include experience in Python programming and an introduction to statistics.

Recommended textbooks

There are no required textbooks for this course, but contents from the following texts will be used.


Tiffany Timbers, Trevor Campbell, and Melissa Lee,
Data Science: A First Introduction,
Taylor and Francis, 2024.


Joel Grus,
Data Science from Scratch,
O'Reilly, 2019

Students are responsible for lecture notes, reading assignments, as well as items distributed during the classroom sessions. Important reading materials as well as lecture slides will be placed on Canvas.

Lecture notes

Readings

Project data resources

Evaluation criteria (subject to revision)

Students will be evaluated as follows:

Exams and quizzes: 60%
Assignments (homework, term-project): 40%

Grading scale:
A = 90%..100%
B = 80%..89%
C = 70%..79%
D = 60%..69%

Exams and quizzes. Exams and quizzes will be conducted in-person, in the classroom, and will be closed book and notes, administered through Canvas. Always bring a device that can connect to Canvas for taking exams or quizzes. During an exam or quiz, no other devices should be used, and no other files or apps should be open except for Canvas. If using a browser to connect to Canvas, only one tab should be open.

  • On exams, quizzes, and lab assignments: For questions with multiple parts, such as “name three parts of…”, avoid combining your answers into a single paragraph. Address each part separately to ensure clarity and prevent confusion. Use clear identifiers like “(1)”, “(2)”, and “(3)” to organize your response. Note that only the first three parts will be assessed if your answer exceeds three parts.
  • On exams, quizzes, and lab assignments: Demonstrate your class engagement! Responses derived from generative AI, Wikipedia, non-authoritative websites, or similar online sources will not earn points. We value answers based on class discussions, presentations, and your lecture notes. This shows your attentiveness, study effort, and ability to connect class concepts to your answers. Students who attend class, take notes, study their notes, and provide responses linked to classroom discussions and content will be rewarded.
  • On exams, quizzes, and lab assignments: Technical explanations and specific details are crucial! Vague and incomplete answers make it difficult to assess your understanding. To earn full credit, provide accurate, comprehensive, and technically sound responses. Avoid vague answers; an almost correct answer that lacks precision or deviates from the topic will not receive full credit.

All written work must be typeset and submitted on Canvas.

Tentative weekly schedule (re-visit for updates)

All lecture notes (slides) are on Canvas

Course introduction

Big data

Data life cycle
    Data collection and pre-processing
    Data cleaning
    Data integration
    Data transformation
    Data discretization

Structured vs semi-structured vs unstructured data

What is data science: Big data characteristics
Applicaitons of data science
Data science relation to other fields
    Statistics
    Computer science
    Engineering
    Business analytics
    Social sciences

Data collection and pre-processing (with a case study)
    Data cleaning
    Data integration
    Data transformation
    Data discretization
Case study: Excessive wine consumption and mortality

Using Pandas and Altair (with a case study)
     Load and explore a dataset
     Apply data frame selection, filtering, transformation
     Visualization and customization

Data science techniques
    Descriptive analysis (presented with multiple case studies)
    Exploratory analysis (presented with a case study)
    Predictive analytics
    Inferential analysis
    Causal analysis
    Mechanistic analysis
Case study: Canadian languages

Tuesday February 11: Exam 1

Tools and skills for data science
    Reading data in varying format and sources
    Reading data from the web and from a database
    Intro to data cleaning and wrangling
    Web scraping
Case study: Canadian languages

Data cleaning and wrangling
    Common wrangling functions
    Common statistical summaries
    Python data structures
    Pandas data frames, Tidy data format
    Extracting and merging rows, columns, advanced selections
    Aggregating data, summary statistics, group calculations
Case study: Mauna Loa CO2, Old Faithful geyser, Earth landmass,

Data science visualization
    Fundamentals of Grammar of Graphics
    Saving visualizations (raster vs vector)
    Visualization guidelines
    Altair, ggplot2, Vega-Lite libraries
    When to choose scatter, line, bar, histogram, ...
Case study: Mauna Loa CO2, Old Faithful geyser, Earth landmass,

A preliminary introduction to ML
Why modeling, optimization models
Domain analysis/understanding
Cancer basics (for the case study)

Thursday March 6: Exam 2

Tools and skills for data science
     Supervised learning
     Classification (training and predicting)
     Advanced classification (balancing, evaluation and tuning)
Case study: Cancer study and dataset
Spring break

Tools and skills for data science (continued)
     Classification: K-nearest neighbors
     Classification: linear regression
Case study: real estate transactions in Sacramento, CA

Tools and skills for data science (continued)
     Classification: evaluation and tuning
     Regression: linear regression
Tools and skills for data science (continued)
     Regression: linear regression
     Unsupervised learning
     Clustering techniques and analysis
Case study: penguin dataset from Palmer Station, Antarctica Long Term Ecological Research

Thursday April 10: Exam 3

Conceptual and logical data modeling
Database and SQL processing for data science Statistical inference
     Statitical sampling, sample distribution
     Statitical Bootstrapping
     Statitical Bootstrap distribution
Case study: Airbnb listings Data science tools and techniques revisited
    Unix tools for data science
    Data science with R
    Data collection evaluation
        Comparing models
        A/B testing
        Cross validation
Model evaluation
    Classification evaluation measures
    Sensitivity and specificity
    Methods for model evaluation
    An application of model evaluation
Emerging trends in data science
Course review

Comprehensive final May 13 10:30-1:00 pm


Attendance, late work, and makeup policies

Attendance expectation. Regular attendance is essential for success in this course and its lab components. Attendance will be be recorded throughout the semester via iClicker. Three or more unexcused absences will result in a one-letter grade reduction in the final course grade, reflected when grades are posted at the end of the term.

Excused absence requests. Requests for excused absences must be submitted in advance and approved by the instructor, except in cases of emergency. For emergencies, notify the instructor as soon as possible following the absence. Supporting documentation must be included with the request. Examples of excusable absences are listed below.

Responsibility for missed work. Students who miss class without a valid excuse are responsible for obtaining missed materials. The instructor or the TAs will not provide individual makeup lectures or one-on-one instruction. It is the student's responsibility to stay informed about course content and course updates.

Late-work, makeup policy. Late work will not be accepted under any circumstances. Make-up options for labs, quizzes, and exams are unavailable except in cases of excused and verified absences. Exceptions will be made for excusable absences.

Timing of make-up assessments. Make-up quizzes and exams for excused absences must be completed before the class session in which the quiz or exam content will be reviewed or its answer key released. Make-up labs must be completed within one week of the excused absence.

Make-up assessment integrity statement. ff granted permission to take a quiz or exam at a later time due to an officially excused absence, the student must affirm the following: “I acknowledge that I have been granted the opportunity to complete this assessment as a result of an officially excused absence from its original administration. I hereby affirm—without reservation—that I have not sought, received, or accessed any information regarding the content, structure, or subject matter of this quiz or exam from any individual who previously completed it. This includes, but is not limited to, verbal conversations, written notes, online discussions, messaging apps, shared files, or any other form of communication. I understand that violating this pledge constitutes academic misconduct and will result in immediate disciplinary action, including a failing grade on the assessment and referral to the School of Engineering disciplinary committees.”

Common policies

Technical problems. If you experience technical problems with your EECS account or the EECS servers or the lab equipment, please submit a support request help at: https://tsc.ku.edu/request-support-engineering-tsc.

Inside classroom policy. Students are expected to come to the class on time, be attentive and engaged, conduct themselves professionally, and avoid anything that could cause a distraction or detrimental either for other students learning or for the instructor's presentations. Profanity and swearing is not allowed.

Students are expected to actively participate in all classroom presentations and discussions, ask questions, and regularly make contributions such as offering comments, responding with good answers, and providing feedback.

Canvas announcements. Announcements is a Canvas tool to post important information and updates to all members of a course. It is your responsibility to regularly check your Canvas account for such announcements (students may also receive an email notification when a new announcement is posted).

Email communications E-mail communication is fast, flexible, and effective. You have an @ku.edu email account and you are expected to regularly check it. Important information may also be communicated via email.

You are a student registered in a course offered by the School of Engineering at the University of Kansas, a top regional and a nationally ranked institution. Your communications, especially written communications (composition, grammar, spelling, punctuation, etc), should reflect that status. Please follow these email guidelines and etiquettes.

Send text-only emails in text-only format. All classroom assignments, labs, or projects should be typeset and submitted on Canvas. Other documents (e.g., documents for an excusable absence) shoud be emailed in PDF or a well-known image format (e.g., JPG or PNG). See the Guidelines for submitting electronic documents.

Grade and absence clarification or correction. If you believe your grades on an assignment, lab, quiz, or exam are incorrect, you should formally submit a grade appeal via email to the instructor within one week of receiving the graded work. Similarly, if you have an excusable absence, and you did not provide documentation prior to the absence, submit relevant documentation within one week of the absence. Failure to address concerns within these timeframes will result in the decision becoming final. This timeline ensures timely resolution and fairness for all parties involved.

Cell phone policy. Cell phones should be turned off before coming to the classroom. Cell phone use for the purposes of texting, email or other social media should be avoided. Earphones for music are OK during lab work or individualized problem solving, as long as the volume allows you to hear announcements. Also cell phone or other cameras may be used to photograph projects and the whiteboard but avoid shots that include the presenter or other students.

Laptop/electronic device policy. The use of laptops, tablets or similar devices is common for taking notes but turn off audio and avoid any possible uses that could cause distraction for others (e.g., Web surfing or social media visits).

Incomplete grade policy. "Incomplete (I) grades are used to note, temporarily, that students have been unable to complete a portion of the required course work during that semester due to circumstances beyond their control. Incomplete work must be completed and assigned an A-F or S/U grade within the time period prescribed by the course instructor. After one calendar year from the original grade due date, an Incomplete (I) grade will automatically convert to a grade of F or U, or the lapsed grade assigned by the course instructor."

Also please review change of grade policy here and here.

Accommodations for students with disabilities. The University of Kansas is committed to providing equal opportunity for participation in all programs, services and activities. Requests for special accommodations may be made thru the KU Student Access Services.

The Provost's freedom of expression statement . "Our IRISE values will guide us and our students as we all engage with each other in respectful freedom of expression.

In a setting as diverse as KU, we will inevitably encounter ideas, opinions and philosophies that are different than our own and which some personally find uncomfortable or offensive. To be clear, threats, incitement of violence and targeted harassment are not protected speech under the First Amendment. Offensive speech, although it can be painful, is generally considered protected speech. We need to strongly encourage and facilitate civil and respectful discussion and interaction. We simply must not inhibit or penalize expression protected by the First Amendment."

KU's diversity policy statement. "As a premier international research university, the University of Kansas is committed to an open, diverse and inclusive learning and working environment that nurtures the growth and development of all. KU holds steadfast in the belief that an array of values, interests, experiences, and intellectual and cultural viewpoints enrich learning and our workplace. The promotion of and support for a diverse and inclusive community of mutual respect require the engagement of the entire university..."

Please also see: KU's statement on diversity and inclusion.

KU's nondiscrimination, equal opportunity. "The University of Kansas prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, sex, national origin, age, ancestry, disability, status as a veteran, sexual orientation, marital status, parental status, gender identity, gender expression, and genetic information in the University's programs and activities."

Please also see: KU's statement on nondiscrimination and on racial and ethnic harassment policy.

KU's sexual harassment policy. "The University of Kansas prohibits sexual harassment and is committed to preventing, correcting, and disciplining incidents of unlawful harassment, including sexual harassment and sexual assault."

Please also see KU's statement on sexual harassment.

KU's mandatory reporter statement. "The University of Kansas has decided that all employees, with few exceptions, are responsible employees or mandatory reporters who must report incidents of discrimination, harassment, and sexual violence that they learn of in their employment at KU to the Office of Civil Rights and Title IX. This includes faculty members. As such, if you share information about discrimination, harassment, or sexual violence with me, I will have to relay that information to the Office of Civil Rights and Title IX. I truly value your trust in me to share that information and I want to be upfront about my requirement as a mandatory reporter. If you are interested in contacting KU’s confidential resources (those who do not have to make disclosures to OCRTIX), there are: the Care Coordinator, Melissa Foree; CAPS therapists; Watkins Health Care Providers; and the Ombuds Office."

Please see KU's statement on mandatory reporting.

KU's commercial note-taking ventures. "Pursuant to the University of Kansas’ Policy on Commercial Note-Taking Ventures, commercial note-taking is not permitted in this course. Lecture notes and course materials may be taken for personal use, for the purpose of mastering the course material, and may not be sold to any person or entity in any form. Any student engaged in or contributing to the commercial exchange of notes or course materials will be subject to discipline, including academic misconduct charges, in accordance with University policy. Please note: note-taking provided by a student volunteer for a student with a disability, as a reasonable accommodation under the ADA, is not the same as commercial note-taking and is not covered under this policy."

Please see KU's statement on commercial note-taking.

Concealed handguns. "Individuals who choose to carry concealed handguns are solely responsible to do so in a safe and secure manner in strict conformity with state and federal laws and KU weapons policy. Safety measures outlined in the KU weapons policy specify that a concealed handgun:

  • Must be under the constant control of the carrier.
  • Must be out of view, concealed either on the body of the carrier, or backpack, purse, or bag that remains under the carriers custody and control.
  • Must be in a holster that covers the trigger area and secures any external hammer in an un-cocked position.
  • Must have the safety on, and have no round in the chamber."

LLM and generative AI tools

Generative AI tools—such as ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot, Gemini , and others—can be valuable resources for learning. When used appropriately, they may assist in brainstorming, exploring ideas, and refining drafts. However, they must never replace your own intellectual work.

These tools are akin to the writing center consultants, the EECS programming tutors, and lab assistants: they can guide and support but must not generate final submissions. Submitting content primarily generated by AI is a violation of academic integrity, comparable to submitting work completed by someone else.

Unless explicitly permitted, all coursework must reflect your original understanding, reasoning, and expression. If you use AI tools at any stage of an assignment, you are required to disclose that use via a brief reflection, which must include:

  • A description of how and why AI was used
  • The specific prompts you entered
  • How you validated and revised the AI output
  • The challenges or limitations you faced while using AI

Failure to disclose use of AI tools or submitting AI-generated work as your own will be treated as academic misconduct. Minimum consequences include a zero on the assignment. Depending on severity, further penalties may include failure in the course and formal referral to the School of Engineering disciplinary committee.

This course is designed to build your skills—not evaluate the performance of generative tools. Authentic engagement with course challenges leads to meaningful growth. Overreliance on AI undermines both your learning and the integrity of our academic community.

Intellectual honesty is not optional—it defines your identity as an engineer, a scholar, and a professional.
.

Academic integrity policy

The University of Kansas, the School of Engineering, and the Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science (EECS) maintain a zero-tolerance policy toward academic dishonesty and misconduct. All students enrolled in this course are expected to uphold the highest standards of integrity and professionalism in their academic work.

Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to:

  • Plagiarism: Representing another person’s work, writing, or ideas—whether published, unpublished, or submitted by another student—as one’s own, without proper attribution.
  • Unauthorized collaboration: Giving or receiving unapproved help on assignments, projects, quizzes, or exams.
  • Misrepresentation: Knowingly presenting false information or misattributing the source of academic work.
  • Cheating: Using unauthorized resources during assessments or submitting work completed by someone else.
  • Falsification of research or data: Fabricating results, manipulating data, or misreporting findings.

The minimum consequence for an academic integrity violation is a zero on the item in question (e.g., lab, assignment, quiz, or exam). Depending on severity, penalties may include a grade reduction, a failing grade for the course, and formal referral to the School of Engineering's disciplinary committee for further review and sanctions.

All definitions and procedures follow institutional policy and guidance outlined by the University of Kansas Office of Student Affairs and the EECS Department. Students are expected to be familiar with and adhere to these standards at all times.

Please also see KU's academic misconduct policy

LMS features. During exams or quizzes, only one device should be used, with solely the Canvas app or a single browser tab for Canvas open. Having any other app or file open will be considered a violation of academic integrity. To further facilitate academic integrity, the following features of Canvas will be utilized:

  • Each exam and quiz will be conducted synchronously in classroom, will be scheduled on a regular weekly session.
  • Each exam or quiz will have a limited and narrow time (set via a timer) to be completed and each person will get only one chance to do it.
  • Exam and quiz questions will be randomly numbered for each person. Furthermore, the multiple choice, matching and similar questions will have randomized choice selections. As a result, a choice like "All of the above" or "None of the above" may not be the last choice and refers to the other choices.
  • Exam and quiz questions will be displayed one-at-a time, with no backtracking.
  • The "originality checking" mechanisms of LMS will be utilized for exams but also assignments. LMS is able to check written responses against online databases of previously published works and trace sentences or clauses to other sources.
  • LMS features to prohibit printing, copying/pasting of exams will be turned on.
  • LMS lockdown feature will be employed.

Code of student rights and responsibility: Code of Student Rights and Responsibilities

The School of Engineering statement on EdTech

"With the switch to online teaching as a result of the Coronavirus pandemic, professors and instructors at the KU School of Engineering are aware that some students are actively posting assignments, laboratory, and exam questions and responses to EdTech services (e.g., Chegg) even during exam time frames.

Keep in mind that when a person signs up to participate by either uploading, and/or downloading, and/or using posted material from these sites, the “terms of service” that are agreed to do not protect the person when KU and/or the School of Engineering decide to conduct investigations related to academic misconduct (e.g., plagiarism and/or cheating).

In fact, EdTech services, like Chegg, retain contact information of students who use their services and will release that information, which is traceable, upon request. Using these services constitutes academic misconduct, which is not tolerated in the School of Engineering. It violates Article 3r, Section 6 of its Rules & Regulations, and may lead to grades of F in compromised course(s), transcript citations of academic misconduct, and expulsion from the University of Kansas.

If unsure about assignments, it is important that students use the allowable available resources, such as instructor office hours, graduate teaching assistants, and/or tutoring. The School of Engineering wants students to be successful; cheating is not the way to attain that success."